Could the Malaysian govt have shot down the plane and didn't want the public to know they did it? The reason it could of been shot down, as the theory goes, is when the plane turned left, and the tracker was manually shut off in the cockpit, and the plane flew over Malaysia for an hour, ... could the govt try and fail to contact the pilots, then the govt quickly decides it must be a terrorist act, and proceed to shoot it down to avoid another 911??
Could the govt have manually taken over the controls from ground & crashed it? I don't think so if they would of landed it. If it was shot down, then if terrorist act, why not crash into KL?
govt says they lost track of plane? how can that happen? they had pings that the pilots had no control over? who could of shot the plane down? and no one steps up to claim terrorist act?
could of been shot down and why and by who? whom?
Could the govt have manually taken over the controls from ground & crashed it? I don't think so if they would of landed it. If it was shot down, then if terrorist act, why not crash into KL?
govt says they lost track of plane? how can that happen? they had pings that the pilots had no control over? who could of shot the plane down? and no one steps up to claim terrorist act?
could of been shot down and why and by who? whom?